Steer More, Row Less?
I think I was born practical. As a result I really hate wasting time, money, or resources.
No surprise then that I have very little tolerance for red tape – meaning complex and time-consuming forms and procedures.
While I no longer work for government or a bureaucracy, a number of recent encounters were a reminder of just how darn good they can be in terms of generating it. And the thing is, every centimeter of that red tape was generated by government with the very best of intentions. What makes it even worse is that the red tape keeps increasing because when a problem is identified, the solution always seems to be the addition of a new report, system, or policy instead of taking something away.
I also know it’s not fair to blame those who work for government. I work with a number of government ministries filled with stellar people. Unfortunately, they are too often trapped in bad systems. These include systems for controlling finances, human resources, purchasing, and communication. These systems make it hard for public servants to do what we pay them to do – serve the public.
So if everyone had good intentions, how on earth did it get this way?
Bureaucracies evolved as we moved from an agricultural-based society to the manufacturing era beginning in the early 1900’s. As public services increased, we built large, top-down, centralized bureaucracies modeled after our sister private corporations of the day.
In order to ensure standardization and accountability, tasks were generally broken into simple parts and assigned to different employees or departments along with specific policies and procedures. The assumption was that we couldn’t trust employees to make decisions so everything had to be spelled out. Not only that, we then needed to check up on them to make sure they adhered to the rules. Deviations often meant more rules and more audits until we’ve now gotten to the point where there is so much red tape that the smallest action takes too long and costs too much.
While this emphasis on standardization and a top-down chain of command had its time and place, it simply isn’t a good fit for today’s knowledge economy and its accompanying rapid change, information technologies, and demanding public.
It especially isn’t conducive to innovation. To be fair, some government employees get very creative in terms of circumventing or making the systems work for them, but too often employees learn not to trust their common sense or to rock the boat. And, since the very nature of innovation requires a departure from standard operating policy and procedures, only the very tenacious will be able to put their innovative ideas into practice given the constraints they face. The rest understand their job is to make sure that every dollar is spent in the budget category in the year for which it was appropriated, that every individual hired or promoted is consistent within dictated guidelines, and every purchase is bought through competitive bidding.
So what can we do about it?
First, we need to emphasize and celebrate more entrepreneurship in government by shifting from being systems where employees are accountable for following rules to instead becoming systems in which they are accountable for achieving results. This will mean giving them more autonomy over their budget, human resources, communications, and purchasing systems. Instead of punishing mistakes, the emphasis will be placed on innovation and preventing problems.
Second, we need to ensure customers are put first by listening and responding to meet their needs.
Third, we can empower employees to get results by decentralizing authority. We need to trust those on the front lines to make more of their own decisions, solve their problems, and be accountable for their results.
Lastly, we need to work at making government better and less obsolete by being brave about examining all departments and functions to eliminate duplication and make tough decisions about whether or not the private sector or non-profit organizations might be better suited to getting the job done.
None of this will be easy. It will require government ministries and departments with clear and meaningful vision and direction, ensuring more flexible budgets tied to outcomes, a commitment to “steering more and rowing less”, and the trust to delegate and empower more.
Thousands of public servants across the country possess extensive education, a wealth of experience, exceptional but too often untapped competencies, and a spirit of dedication to serving the public good. Let’s make sure they have a system that doesn’t get in their way.
Posted on 02-27-11
Yes! We are so NOT tapping into the potential resources that the govt and their employees can bring. It is so easy to become discouraged by red tape that you miss out on the benefit of their collective wisdom!•Posted by Janet Naclia on 02/28/11 at 08:55 AM
Several weeks ago, a person at a training session I participated in, shared a unique perspective on bureaucracies. He said that he saw a bureaucracy as a terraced field on the side of a hill. Like the terraces catch and slow the rain coming down the hill to prevent washouts, he saw a bureaucracy as a means of slowing decisions to allow thoughtful deliberations to benefit most people. Using this analogy, I think it is time, like you so eloquently say, Brenda, to empower the talented and dedicated government staff members to be the “farmers” and focus on results, make more of their own decisions, solve their problems, and be accountable for their results.•Posted by Barb Pedersen on 03/02/11 at 10:27 PM
Next entry: A Spirit of Striving
Previous entry: Could Boomers and Generation Y be an Ideal Match?