The Science of Softness

I have a brain that is constantly leapfrogging.

So, while my thought processes may not be typical, I’ve learned over the years just to go with it whenever possible. While it often makes for chaotic conversations, it typically leads to learnings that are deep, rich, meaningful, and informative.

Consequently, when my brain recently landed on the topic of focus groups, it seemed important to pay attention.

Not as random or obtuse as it might sound, the subject was in part triggered by a passage I was reading in Steve Jobs’ biography where he went on record as saying he didn’t believe in focus groups.

As he put it, “It’s really hard to design products by focus groups. A lot of times, people don’t know what they want until you show it to them.”

He also said, “It’s not the consumers’ job to know what they want.”

For those, like me, who believe in the importance of empowering end users, it really is something of a conundrum.

It’s a conundrum because as our world gets more complicated so too do focus groups and the role they play in helping us innovate. After all, if people “don’t know what they don’t know”, how can they be empowered to design innovative products and services for business, government, or communities?

Henry Ford once said, “If I had asked my customers what they wanted they would have said a faster horse.” Being as cars, or “horseless carriages” as they were first named, didn’t yet exist, how likely is it that someone would have come up with the idea?

By definition, innovation is new and original—Peter Drucker defines it as change that creates a new dimension of performance.  Accordingly, how can we expect people to envision and contribute something to a focus or feedback group when it isn’t something they’ve typically experienced?

That seems to be the challenge.

And yet, maybe it isn’t as complicated as we might think.

Perhaps it just means we need to focus on the unmet needs and wants of people and then attempt to meet them.

We can do that with focus groups that ask people to explore their wants and needs, or we can simply work hard at putting ourselves into the shoes of those we are trying to serve.

I started thinking more about that kind of approach after a recent conversation with a colleague who, despite being brilliant, hasn’t always had a lot of success as an entrepreneur. Her innovative ideas always seem to be ahead of her time and as a result don’t always connect with the potential consumer.

Even in her case, it might be best to try to talk to potential consumers or stakeholders about their needs and wants, or to hone her empathy skills and envision their particular situation in order to determine how her imagination and creativity could be used to develop products and services that respond to their needs.

Of course, empathy is a much softer emotional skill that requires understanding and sharing the feelings of others. Not a skill to be taken lightly, it will be a challenge for those who by nature are more rational and driven by facts and research.

As a result it also points to, and reinforces the need for innovation that is not about a lone inventor with a brilliant light bulb moment.

Instead, it makes it clearer that innovating for a future not yet invented will require diverse teams able to combine hard science with the science of softness.

Posted on 06-17-12


Add your Comment here:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:




Next entry: When You Hate Your Job

Previous entry: Endings are Just New Beginnings